The Silent Transfer: The
Case of El-Nu'aman Village
After
the 1967 War,
Israel annexed some 70 sq. km to the municipal boundaries of West
Jerusalem and imposed Israeli law on this area. These annexed
territories included not only the part of Jerusalem which had been
under Jordanian rule, but also an additional 64 square kilometers, most
of which had belonged to 28 villages in the West Bank and part of which
belonged to the municipalities of Bethlehem and Beit Jala. Most of the
inhabitants of the annexed villages were registered by the Israeli
civil administration as residents of Jerusalem.
Located on a hilly terrain on the southern edge of the Jerusalem
municipal border is Mazmuriah. The villagers' ancestors have lived on
the land for over 150 years, and the inhabitants have titles testifying
to their ownership of the land. Today they comprise approximately 200
people (20 families).
Unlike the inhabitants of the 27 other villages, the inhabitants of
Mazmuriah were registered as residents of Umm Al-Tal'a, a village
located 2 km away, a place were their village elder ("mukhtar") lived.
Umm Al-Tal'a, however, does not fall within the Jerusalem municipality
borders and, accordingly, the residents of Mazmuria did not receive
Israeli identity cards which East Jerusalemites hold. Instead, they
were given West Bank identity cards.
The absurd result is that the residents and their houses belong to
different legal and administrative systems: the houses and land are
part of the (annexed) Jerusalem municipality, while the inhabitants are
residents of the West Bank.
-
Until
1992, there had been only minor problems regarding the overlapping
systems. That year, though, employees of the Jerusalem municipality and
Interior Ministry visited Mazmuriah and told the residents that from
then on all construction within the village was prohibited -- no new
homes could be built.
-
From 1992, the villagers no longer
received building permits. The area was classified as "green land,"
land that no one can build on and is basically a nature reserve. Young
adults who wished to build a family home were forced to choose between
leaving their birthplace or building illegally, knowing that it was
likely that their new houses would be destroyed by the Israeli
authorities.
-
In 1995, the inhabitants were
ordered to take their children out of the Um-Tuba school, located
within the Jerusalem municipality borders and 1 km from their homes,
and to move them to a school within the West Bank. The children have
been forced to attend schools that are further away from their houses
even though the village Mazmuriah itself is considered by Israel to be
within the Jerusalem municipal borders.
-
The Jerusalem municipality and
Israeli civil administration have systematically refused to provide
basic services like water and sewage to the villagers, arguing that the
area is classified as "green land." Yet, simultaneously, they have also
obstructed the inhabitants' efforts to receive such services from the
Palestinian Authority, claiming that the PA cannot provide services to
areas under Israeli jurisdiction. Consequently, on a number of
occasions the Israeli government has destroyed water pipes between
Mazmuriah and the neighboring Al Hass, which is located in the West
Bank. Along the same lines, Israeli authorities have uprooted telephone
poles provided by the Palestinian Authority in 1998. Today the
residents receive water services from the Palestinian Authority.
-
The municipality and the
administration have systematically blocked the access roads to the
village. All of the roads to Jerusalem have been closed off and even
the main roads to the West Bank have been blocked.
Despite
all of these
problems, the residents have refused to abandon their village. But now
the Israeli authorities are beginning a new stage in their attack. This
time, the weapon is the "separation fence" being built around
Jerusalem.


-
At
the beginning of April 2003, a man, who introduced himself as Dvir, the
coordinator of the Housing Ministry, Defense Ministry, and the
municipality, visited the village accompanied by border policemen. He
wrote down the names and the identity numbers of all of the homeowners,
and announced that they would have to vacate the village since it was
soon to become part of a no-man's-land between Israel and the
Palestinian entity. People who had built their homes prior to 1993
would receive compensation, he said, the remaining houses would be
destroyed without any compensation.
-
Concomitantly, a map of the separation
fence was presented to the residents, showing how the fence would
surround the village on it southern side and thus separate it from the
West Bank. No openings or gates were planned for this section of the
fence, meaning that even if the residents are allowed to stay in their
village, they will be totally cut off from the West Bank, where their
children receive education, and from the PA from which they receive
water services; Israel does not intend to provide these services in the
PA's stead.
-
If the residents were to move to the
Palestinian Authority's side of the fence, they would be separated from
most of their agricultural land (around 500 dunams of olive trees). The
nearby Al Hass's agricultural land will also be confiscated; in this
case, the village will remain part of the Palestinian Authority, but
its land will be on the Israeli side of the fence. In addition, the
olive groves are in immediate danger of being destroyed, since the
fence and the planned road connecting Jerusalem with the Jewish
Settlement Tequa will most likely pass right through these groves.
Thus, the majority of the residents will be deprived of their main
source of livelihood.
-
The fence will separate the
villagers of Al-Hass from their cemetery. The cemetery of Mazmuriah
will also remain within the Israeli borders, and if the residents are
forced to move to the other side of the fence, they will be unable to
visit their dead.
Conclusions
Israeli
has managed to create a legal separation between the Mazmuriah
villagers and their houses and land. If the scheme proceeds as planned,
the residents will become "squatters" on their own land. Moreover, by
classifying the village as "green land," the municipality of Jerusalem
has made the village illegal and bureaucratically non-existent. The
idea is to gain full control of the land without the residents.
Two
crucial aspects need to be emphasized:
-
The
Israeli government hopes to expel the residents from the village. It is
highly unlikely, however, that the villagers will actually be forced
out of their homes at gunpoint and put on buses. A more intricate
strategy will be employed. By creating a physical barrier between the
village and the West Bank (the separation fence) and not allowing the
inhabitants to have any contact with either the Palestinian Authority
or the Jerusalem municipality, their infrastructure of existence will
be totally undermined. Ultimately they will leave the village of "their
own accord."
-
This scenario, if it transpires, is in
blatant violation of the principles laid out in the Road Map. Israel
will, in effect, be carrying out a unilateral action that will create
facts on the ground and which is in blatant violation of basic human
rights as well as all the agreements it has signed, not least the Road
Map. Does the principle "Action not Talk" also apply to the Israeli
Government?
The
village residents
have simple and straightforward demands. They are asking that either
(1) the fence be built to the north of the village so that it will not
separate them from their land or from the Palestinian Authority; or,
(2), that it will be built as planned on the south, but that Israel
provide them with identity cards and supply all of the services that
they are entitled to by law.
These demands are reasonable and fair, and there is nothing in them
that presents a danger to Israel's security. We, members of Ta'ayush,
Jewish-Arab partnership, think it is imperative to begin working
immediately in order to prevent the expulsion of the villagers.
For additional information, please contact Yusef Darawe 052-293258 or
Efrat Ben-Zeev 02-5817101
|
July 11th
2003:
Israeli-Palestinian Work Day against the Separation Fence - the
"Starvation Fence"
|
|
On July 11th
2003 we held an Israeli-Palestinian work
day at the village of El-Nu'aman (Mazmuriah) at the
southern outskirts of Jerusalem. Through our joint
work we expressed
our solidarity with two hundred residents of the village, whose homes
are under threat by the establishment of the "Separation Fence" on
their lands.
Click here to view photos of the
work-day
See here article published in BBC-Brazil: "Israelenses
desafiam governo em solidariedade a palestinos".
Despite wide publicity of our presence in the village (which was
broadcasted by CNN and resulted in renewed interest of the Israeli
media in El-Nuaman case), the pressure of the authorities continues. At
01:15 at night on the 23 rd of July 16 men from the village
were arrested by the border police, brought to the "300 checkpoint" (on
the main road from Jerusalem to Bethlehem) and threatened that they
will be prosecuted for "illegal stay in Jerusalem" (which means staying
in their own homes!).
The people of the village are preparing the legal action via the High
Court of Justice to oblige the Jerusalem municipality to issue them
residence permit. This will hopefully reduce the harassment, although
will not stop the destruction of the residents' infrastructure due to
the building of the separation fence and the settlers' by-pass roads on
their lands.
We are closely watching the developments and may be required for the
urgent action.
|
- Can
bad fences make good
neighbours? Israel's
separation wall is being used
to annex territory
By: Neve Gordon, Jerusalem
- "The
Zionist dream fulfilled", article by Uzi Benziman, "Ha'aretz", June
20th
2003
- "Tzachi
divides Jerusalem", article by Akiva Eldar, "Ha'aretz", August 12th
2003
- "Carving
up Jerusalem, for security, of course", article by Akiva Eldar,
"Ha'aretz", August 19th
2003
- "Even
prison has a door", article by Lily Galili,
"Ha'aretz", August 29th
2003
- "There's
a wall in the way", article by Gideon Levy,
"Ha'aretz", September 4th
2003
- "Betwixt,
between, bewildered", article by Amira Hass,
"Ha'aretz", September 5th
2003
- "An
outcome too terrible to imagine", article by Yigal Bronner,
"Ha'aretz", September 17th
2003
|